Sunday, July 09, 2006

Račak and Dubrava left out

8 July 2006 | 11:19 | Source: B92

THE HAGUE -- The trial of the six former Serbian officials will not include the cases of the killings in Račak, Padalište, or Dubrava prison.

This was decided by the Hague Tribunal Court Council. The presiding judge Ian Bonomy estimated that the Račak, Padalište and Dubrava events are not representative of the prosecution’s assertion that the Serb forces in the spring of 1999 conducted a campaign of terror against approximately 800.000 Kosovo Albanians by means of forcible deportation and murder.

Although the Račak incident, in which 45 Albanians died under unclear circumstances, was a direct cause for the bombardment of Serbia in 1999, the Hague prosecution said it will not dwell on this, but solely on the legal aspect of the events: ‘We still believe these three events should remain within the case, because they are important, because it is important that a court decision be made on these events. Unfortunately, as you know, we never reached a verdict on Račak and Dubrava in the Milošević trial.’ Anton Nikiforov, Prosecution spokesman, said.

The Hague prosecution expects to receive an official court statement, and to make its decision whether to appeal next week. Possible appeal would be considered by the Hague council of appeal.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

107,000 registered refugees in Serbia

20 June 2006 | 12:33 | Source: FoNet

BELGRADE -- There are 107,000 registered refugees living in Serbia.

Refugee Commissioner Dragiša Dabetić said that over 200,000 refugees have received citizenship and that the proposal for changes and additions to the Refugee Law will make their integration easier.

Dabetić said that the law does not include internally displaced refugees from Kosovo, who are not technically considered refugees even though they make up the majority of people housed currently in the 109 collective refugee centres.

He said that the changes in the Refugee Law will help solve the problems of finding residences for these people, and will help formally and legally separate refugees from those seeking political asylum.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Bosnian capital shaken by radical Islam

by Rusmir Smajilhodzic
Fri Jun 16, 12:33 PM ET

SARAJEVO (AFP) - The people of Sarajevo, renowned for their pluralism, have been shaken after a series of incidents including the murder of a Muslim woman by her Islamic extremist son who questioned her faith.

Upholders of Bosnia's moderate version of Islam say the problem caused by an influx of hardline fighters during the country's 1992-1995 war has worsened in recent months, highlighted by the gruesome murder.

"Bosnia's tradition of Islam is tolerant, it promotes pluralism and we should not allow those representing a one-track ideology to teach us," says Jasmin Merdan.

The 26-year-old -- a practising Muslim who portrays himself as a "victim" of the Wahhabi ideology before abandoning it -- is one of the few courageous voices in Bosnia who dares to criticise extremism.

"They express their convictions with violence, introduce anarchy in mosques and preach intolerance," says Merdan, who recently founded an association in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo to fight against "those who deny basic teachings of Islam".

Supported by a handful of independent journalists, Merdan recently published a book condemning the harmful influence on Bosnian people of Wahhabism, a radical version of Islam.

Merdan says the book was "warmly welcomed by imams who do not dare to speak" but sparked death threats against him and pressure from members of the Wahhabi community.

Several incidents since the beginning of the year have shaken Sarajevo and confirmed Merdan's fears.

In February, a young man who recently converted to Wahhabism killed his mother reportedly because she refused to join him for morning prayers.

After the murder, the 23-year-old went to a "Wahhabi" mosque with blood on his hands and clothes, telling his fellow believers that he just made a "sacrifice to God".

In addition, several young couples have complained to the local media and police that they had been harassed by "bearded" men in parks while they were kissing and hugging.

According to Merdan, they were members of the so-called "Sharia militia" -- a group of self-styled religious police. However local police said they were not aware of the group's existence.

Wahhabism is a hardline version of Islam that originated in 18th century Saudi Arabia. It took its roots in Bosnia, whose Muslims are mostly followers of moderate Islam, in the country's 1992-1995 war.

During the conflict, hundreds of volunteers from Islamic countries -- known as "holy warriors" or mujahedin -- came to Bosnia to fight alongside its mainly Muslim army.

All of the foreign fighters were expected to leave the country following the war, but an unknown number of them remained and obtained Bosnian citizenship mostly by marrying local women.

"Since the war, the number of followers of Wahhabism has been growing," says Merdan, slamming the "passiveness" of Bosnia's laic and religious authorities.

Some 40 percent of Bosnia's 3.8 million inhabitants are Muslims. Orthodox Christian Serbs represent about 31 percent, while Roman Catholic Croats account for around 10 percent.

Merdan voiced regret that the Bosnian Muslim religious leader, Mustafa Ceric, has never publicly condemned the activities of the Wahhabists.

Meanwhile, the editor-in-chief of a Bosnian weekly, Vildana Selimbegovic, deplored the "isolation" of the few Muslim theologians who voice their dissatisfaction with the presence of Wahhabists.

"Politicians do no want to or are too afraid to talk. The majority of Muslims remain silent. It seems that they will remain silent until the devil claims his due," Selimbegovic wrote in the weekly Dani.

Sarajevo's imposing King Fahd Mosque, named after the late Saudi monarch who financed its construction, has in the past few years become the core of Bosnian followers of Wahhabism.

"Sometimes I ask myself whether I am really in Sarajevo. The number of bearded men and women dressed in chadors will soon be equal to other people," comments Adnan, a young Muslim who lives near the mosque.

Adnan says that the King Fahd Mosque has attracted a number of Wahhabi families from surrounding neighborhoods.

"They try the same recipe as in Sudan or other Arab countries," says Merdan.

"If we allow them, in 20 years, people like me will not be allowed to speak," he stresses.

Serbs Fade Away in Sarajevo

While talk of a mass exodus may be nonsense, the Serb community faces certain decline in Bosnia's capital.

By Predrag Popovic in Sarajevo (Balkan Insight, 14 June 06)
Prominent Sarajevo Serbs have dismissed claims by Republika Srpska, RS, politicians that their community is set to leave the city imminently, but with falling numbers, a bleak economic outlook and continuing discrimination their prospects seem poor.

The number of Serbs in the capital has slumped from about 160,000 in the 1990s to between 20,000 and 40,000. The exact number is unknown as no census has taken place in Bosnia and Hercegovina since the war.

During the Serbian siege in the Nineties, the Serb community experienced random violence from the Bosnian army, which attacked, killed and evicted Serbs from their homes. While some put the number of fatalities in the hundreds, RS says thousands may have been killed.

Under international pressure, the Bosnia and Hercegovina Council of Ministers last month agreed to set up a truth commission for the city, tasked with uncovering the real number of victims of all ethnicities and the nature of their deaths.

While the politicians argued, some of the RS media added fuel to the fire by publishing dramatic accounts of the discrimination faced by Sarajevo Serbs and claiming a mass exodus was imminent.

Some leading Sarajevo Serbs, such as Nenad Markovic, coach to the national basketball team, have poured scorn on such claims. Markovic said he had no plans to leave the city he had lived in since the age of four.

"I went to kindergarten and primary school here, and passed through cadet and junior basketball teams; experienced my first love. Everything," he told Balkan Insight. "After all that, it would make no sense to go to Belgrade or Zagreb to seek my fortune just because I am not a Bosniak, a Muslim."

Markovic's decision to play for Bosnia’s national basketball team during the siege won him as much admiration among Bosniaks as dislike among nationalist Serbs.

"When I go to Bileca [in RS], they insult me," he said. "The same happens in Banja Luka . [But] I try hard to make every guest feel comfortable in Sarajevo, and prevent local fans from insulting them."

Serbs left Sarajevo in greatest numbers after the 1995 Dayton peace agreement fixed the boundaries of the two new entities, the RS and the Federation, leaving the capital in the latter.

In February and March 1996, most Serbs followed the advice of the leaders of the Serbian Democratic Party, SDS, and left for the RS or for Serbia.

Some who stayed now believe the exodus was unnecessary and blame the politicians who prompted it.

"The biggest ethnic cleanser of Serbs in Sarajevo was [a one-time SDS chief] Momcilo Krajisnik," said Veljko Droca, of the city's Serbian Civic Council.

"As many as 70,000 Serbs left [the suburbs of] Ilijas, Vogosca, Hadzici and Ilidza because of Krajisnik. Where did they go? To Srebrenica, Bratunac, to some cellars and garages, or to Bosniak houses."

Srdjan Dizdarevic, local chair of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, said people faced pressure both from fellow Serbs and Bosniaks to leave.

"After [Bosnia 's former president] Alija Izetbegovic said all those who did not carry arms during the war could stay, everybody got scared," he told Balkan Insight. "Everybody knew all those who had not run away had been mobilised."

Official statistics suggest many Serbs have since returned to Sarajevo.

According to the UN's refugee arm, the UNHCR, 81,820 Serbs had come back by March this year. But the figure is deceptive as it includes those who did so temporarily in order to retain tenancy rights to flats and houses.

"Often it turns out that instead of a whole family, only one family member actually returned," Bakir Jalovcic, UNHCR spokesman in Bosnia, told Balkan Insight.

A survey by the Helsinki Committee says Serbs now comprise more than ten per cent of the population in only two of the city's municipal districts.

"Ethnic cleansing has succeeded in Bosnia and Hercegovina," said Dizdarevic. "Before the war, only one-fifth of all Bosnian municipalities had an absolute majority of any one ethnic group."

Droca, of the Serbian Civic Council, said the number of Serbs is likely to fall further, as most of those remaining are pensioners, many of whom stay on only because Federation pensions are higher than those in the RS.

Younger Serbs have little hope of employment in the civil service - the main source of jobs. Although by law, state institutions must employ a proportionate number of Serbs, Bosniaks and Croats, based on the 1991 census, the rules are mostly a dead letter. In Sarajevo, they are not applied to the health and education department or to municipalities that straddle both entities, such as the district of Ilidza.

According to Dizdarevic, the district of Ilidza, which was 43 per cent Bosniak and 37 per cent Serb before the war, employs 256 Bosniaks in the administration and only 13 Croats and 12 Serbs.

"The government hides behind the laws, reluctant to make a gesture of goodwill," said Dizdarevic, adding that the ruling nationalist parties were most to blame. "Wherever they dominate, they refuse to lend an ear to minorities and their problems. However, when they are the minority, then they fight vigorously for respect of human rights."

Given Bosnia's unemployment rate of around 40 per cent, the pressure to secure government jobs is relentless - and Serbs are at the back of the queue.

The plight of Dragojla Vukovic, a trained nurse, is typical. She has been out of work for three years and her husband is also jobless.
"I want to live in Sarajevo ," she said, "and I have heard the canton will employ 150 nurses, so hopefully I will be one of them.

"I would like to believe there is no discrimination based on national and religious background, but I am not so sure."

Milena and her husband Ljubisa are in a similar situation. "There are no jobs and there is no life for us here," said Ljubisa, a lawyer.

When the war started, Ljubisa was called up into the police, while Milena went to live in Herceg Novi, in Montenegro, with their two young children.

Now they are all back in their old apartment in Ilidza but the hunt for work has been in vain.

"I would like to leave but we have nowhere to go," said Ljubisa. "We tried to settle in Montenegro but it didn't work out. Now I do whatever I can but there is no luck for me. For us Serbs, Sarajevo is not a city to live in."

Milena is also a trained lawyer and her story resembles that of her husband. “I applied for at least a hundred vacancies - but no result," she said. "Unemployment is huge but it also seems they don't like us because of our ethnic background. No one said this straight to our faces, but our job applications are often discarded for minor reasons.

"I hope it changes for the better, for the sake of our children who are going to school and growing up here."
Bosnia's economic misery and the relocation of many companies from Sarajevo means jobs in the private sector are scarce. Moreover, Bosniaks expelled from eastern Bosnia by Serbs tend to get first preference.

Dizdarevic says anti-Serbian feeling is much more covert and less violent than it was in the Nineties, but it is there nevertheless.

"It can boil down to tolerating illegal building more for Bosniaks than Serbs," he said. "Some incidents do occur but these are mostly just messages sprayed on walls as graffiti."

Ljubica Zikic, a novelist who won a literary award in Bosnia for her novel, Images of Disjointed Time, says jobs often appear to go to people whose only qualification was their activity during the war.

Zikic, who works for the Serbian educational and literary society Prosvjeta, said she knew of one head of a Sarajevo municipality who got his job solely because he supplied the municipal building with coal during the siege.

"There are many such people," she said.

Zikic said her absence from the city during the siege, which she spent in Slovenia and Serbia, had counted against her ever since. When she received her award, she says, the media shunned her. "Yet I have lived here for more than 40 years," she protested.

Yet all is not gloom for the Serbs in Sarajevo. In spite of the difficulties experienced by the older residents of the city, some have moved to Sarajevo from Serbia itself since the war, and enjoy the atmosphere.

One is Dragana Erjavec, a journalist who moved from Belgrade in 2001 and has remained here ever since.

"I never intended to stay in this city but things in life simply arrange themselves on their own," she told Balkan Insight

Sarajevo, she realised, was a city where she could "chill out".

"I don't want to say it is better or worse than Belgrade - it just has a different lifestyle," she said.

Erjavec said she had experienced no discrimination on account of coming from Belgrade.

"On the contrary, people in Sarajevo, in spite of all those gruesome things that happened, love Belgrade, and I am glad younger people are rebuilding the bond between the two cities," she said.

"It is great for me in Sarajevo , and as long as it is like that, I will stay here."

Predrag Popovic is a Balkan Insight contributor. Balkan Insight is BIRN'S online publication.

Kosovo: UN concerned at persecution of minorities

Saturday, 17 June 2006, 10:53 am
Press Release: United Nations
Kosovo: UN refugee agency remains concerned at persecution risk for minorities

While removing two Roma communities from the list of people considered at risk in Kosovo, the United Nations refugee agency remains concerned for more than 400,000 Serbs, other Roma and Albanians who could face persecution if they returned to places where they are a minority in the multi-ethnic Serbian province.

“The fragile security environment and serious limitations these people face in exercising their fundamental human rights shows they should continue to be considered at risk of persecution and should continue to benefit from international protection in countries of asylum,” UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) spokesman Ron Redmond told a news briefing in Geneva.

“Return of these minorities should be strictly voluntary, based on fully informed individual decisions,” he added of UNHCR’s latest position paper aimed at guiding states and others making decisions about whether people from Kosovo should continue to receive international protection in an asylum country.

The Ashkaelia and Egyptian Roma communities were taken off the list thanks to positive developments within the inter-ethnic environment, but the paper says their returns should still be approached in a phased manner due to the limited absorption capacity of Kosovo, where Albanians outnumber Serbs and others by 9 to 1.

There are still more than 200,000 refugees and persons of concern to UNHCR from Kosovo in western European and other countries, with an equal number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Serbia, and some 18,000 persons of concern in neighbouring Montenegro.

The report notes that although the overall security situation in Kosovo has progressively improved over the past year, it remains fragile and unpredictable. Minorities continue to suffer from ethnically motivated or criminal incidents. Many incidents remain unreported as the victims often fear reprisals from perpetrators.

Serbs and Roma continue to face serious obstacles in accessing essential services in health, education, justice and public administration. Discrimination as well as low representation of minorities in the administrative structures further discourages minorities from exercising their basic rights.

The UN has administered Kosovo ever since North Atlantic Treaty Alliance (NATO) forces drove out Yugoslav troops in 1999 amid grave rights abuses in ethnic fighting. Talks are now underway to determine its future status and the return of Serb refugees is seen as a crucial factor in reaching a decision. Independence and autonomy are among options that have been mentioned. Serbia rejects independence.

Monday, June 19, 2006

Church vandalised in Obilić

19 June 2006 | 09:52 | Source: Beta

OBILIĆ -- Unknown vandals demolished a church in the centre of Obilić, Kosovo and Metohija Radio reported.

According to reports, four crosses were removed from the church and taken, as was the chimney on the right side of the church and part of the roofing.

Municipal Coordinator in Obilić Mirče Jakovljević said that this is yet another attack on everything that is Serbian in Obilić. Jakovljević said that the church vandalism is yet another argument that proves that the international community cannot and does not have the power to stop such acts.

“This is further evidence that Serbs need new municipalities in order to stay here. If this does not happen, then villages such as Obilić will be ethnically clean very soon. We are questioning whether KFOR is prepared to secure safety and security for us and our children.” Jakovljević said.

No one from the Kosovo Police Service was willing to comment on the incident. This same church in Obilić was set on fire on March 18, 2004.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Who Lost Kosovo?

By Cliff Kincaid | June 15, 2006

Senator John Kerry, the defeated 2004 Democratic candidate for president, was the subject of a May 28 New York Times article about how he is once again trying to rebut allegations about his military service made by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. With a sympathetic media, such as that represented by the Times story, Kerry thinks he might be able to rehabilitate himself and try another presidential run. The Times endorsed Kerry for president in 2004.

But Kerry may have some competition. On Memorial Day, another former Democratic presidential candidate, retired General Wesley Clark, tried to rewrite the history of the war in Kosovo in order to make himself into a great military hero. "Last week," he said, "I returned to Kosovo for the first time since I retired from military service. For me, this trip was very personal. In 1999, I commanded the NATO forces that stopped the genocide against ethnic Albanians by Slobodan Milosevic and his Serbian forces."

That sounds pretty impressive-commanding the forces that stopped genocide. Too bad it's not true.

Genocide is defined as seeking to eliminate an entire group of people. But the number of dead found in Kosovo after the war was said to be only 2,108. That was the figure given by Carla del Ponte, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, at a December 1999 press conference. But it wasn't clear they were all Kosovo Albanians. Indeed, many may have been Serbs. That's a terrible loss of life, but it's no genocide.

That figure also didn't include the number of Serbs killed in Serbia by the NATO mission commanded by Clark and ordered by President Clinton. The mission was both illegal and unconstitutional, since Clinton never received the authorization of Congress to conduct the war.

In his message, Clark went on to tell another whopper. Referring to the NATO campaign, he said, "This was an example of how we CAN do it right: diplomacy first, strong leadership, working with others, and using force only as a last resort. We had a plan for what to do after the operation before we began air strikes."

Working with others? Congress was bypassed. And what was that plan? Serbia today is being dismembered, so that a Muslim state in Kosovo can be established. Clark didn't mention that most of the Albanians in Kosovo who want independence are Muslims.

He referred his supporters to photos of his visit to Kosovo. Previously, however, Clark had posed for a photo with Hashim Thaci, leader of the terrorist Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), also known by the initials UCK. This is the group laying siege to Serbian Christian churches in Kosovo today.

For those interested in this largely untold (by the media) story, go to the website of Bill Murray, chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, who visited the area in August 2004 and filed this stunning report.

Our media are ready and eager to pounce on Bush whenever he is perceived to have made a misstatement, but a retired General and former Democratic presidential candidate tells blatant lies about Kosovo and gets away with it. In fact, he uses his participation in this illegal and unconstitutional war as a badge of honor.

Bush, of course, will be the favorite target for some time to come. Typical is Frank Rich's forthcoming book about the Bush presidency, The Greatest Story Ever Sold: The Decline and Fall of Truth from 9/11 to Katrina.

That will be the media theme at least until after the November congressional elections.

Rich and his colleagues will try to make you ignore the fact that while Bush has had a policy of fighting terrorists in places like Iraq and Afghanistan, Clinton, Clark & Company had a policy of helping them gain political power through false charges of genocide.

Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report

(text taken from: http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/4643_0_2_0_C/)

Sunday, May 28, 2006

The lingering death of Yugoslavia

Montenegro this week became the latest Balkan region to vote for independence. But what have the trappings of statehood done for the rest of Tito's former empire? Peter Popham reports

Published: 27 May 2006
Once upon a time there was a plausibly modern, enlightened Communist country called Yugoslavia which manufactured cars called Yugos and staged the Winter Olympics and which for many, including millions of Western holidaymakers, was the acceptable face of Eastern Europe, the bit that worked and that we could do business with - all dominated by the benign Mr Tito.

And today? With the decision for independence last week of tiny Montenegro, Yugoslavia is no more. Instead there is a multiplying proliferation of statelets that belong more to the world of Tintin than to what was once thought of as modern Europe.

Tintin would have felt perfectly at home in Podgorica, the Montenegrin capital. The Belgian boy detective, you will remember, arrived in the Balkan kingdom of Syldavia by aeroplane, dropped through a trap door in the fuselage by the dastardly twin brother of Professor Alembick, and landing in a bale of hay. Once there he encountered a world of revolutionaries, spies, moustachioed bandits and anarchists, all in the shade of the gigantic mountains.

Today the grandson of the last king of Montenegro travels regularly to the nation's tiny former capital, Cetinje, by motorcycle, from Paris. He denies he aims to revive the monarchy, but who could be sure? The leader of the country is a musclebound character in a chalk-stripe suit who has been a Communist and an apostle of Serbian expansionism and is now a Montenegrin nationalist. Today he mutters angrily about Serbian "meddling".

In reality (according to the testimony of an Italian gangster) he is a big-time cigarette smuggler. But he is not the only bad hat in town: the Russians are coming! They have bought the country's only factory and huge strips of the beautiful coastline.

It is a country out of comic opera or a period cartoon, with a population one-tenth the size of London. But in a year or two, if Montenegro's tall, sleek, handsome and wily Prime Minister, Milo Djukanovic, gets his way, his sovereign nation will sit alongside the UK, Germany, France and the rest in the councils of the European Union. And jostling behind him in the queue to join will be several other even more improbable specimens.

Yugoslavia ended, but what came into being? We have no handy term for what has replaced the Union of the South Slavs. We are back to the geographical term, the Balkans - from which derives the verb "to balkanise", which means "to break up into small, mutually hostile political units". We are back at the view of the Balkans immortalised by Hergé: a collection of tiny, exotic countries, racked by violence and intrigue, each with their own proud and ancient traditions but ultimately indistinguishable from one another.

And while the end of the Union of Serbia and Montenegro was inevitable, the Balkans have not achieved steady state. That churning, balkanising momentum is still at work. The break-up proceeds. Next up, heartened by the Montenegrins' example, is Kosovo, where the overwhelming Albanian majority favours independence. The Kosovars are expected to get their wish by the end of this year.

And this will set a precedent, because unlike all the bits of Yugoslavia that have broken off so far, Kosovo is not an autonomous republic within the Yugoslav federation but was merely a province within Serbia. When Kosovo breaks away, other disgruntled minorities in other corners of the Balkans will see their moment and hope that time is on their side.

The most universally execrated is Republika Srpska (aka Bosnian Serb Republic), the Serb mini-state that was fashioned by Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic during the Bosnian war as part of the Milosevic fantasy of a Greater Serbia. That mini-state, partially brought into existence by the massacre in Srebrenica, a town that today is firmly within Republika Srpska territory, may have no serious hope of international recognition, but it remains a thorn in the flesh of the High Representative in Sarajevo. And it remains a semi-spectral presence within the immensely complicated polity of Bosnia. It provides, for example, one of the republic's three presidents.

And there are others waiting in the wings. As Kosovo prepares to go independent, the Serbs who constitute the overwhelming majority of the population of the region of northern Kosovo called Mitrovica dream of getting their own state, too. Serbs clustered in the north of Montenegro who resent the decision to break away from Belgrade have separatist dreams of their own, as do Albanians in the south of that republic, and as do Albanians in Macedonia, where a civil war boiled up in 2001.

No one imagines the balkanisation of the Balkans will go that far. But then 15 years ago no one predicted the independence of Yugoslav republics such as Slovenia and Croatia, which are now on their way to joining the European Union. And what's wrong, after all, with states the size of Elephant and Castle or Maida Vale? Perhaps we should all live in countries that size.

From the cane chairs of the long pavement café of the Crna Gora Hotel in the centre of Podgorica, it's hard to disagree. On first blush Montenegro seems an excellent idea, and a very satisfactory little country.

Podgorica, the Montenegrin capital, formerly one of Yugoslavia's several Titograds, was bombed flat by the British during the war, though a small Ottoman old town survived. But although the architecture is not up to much (the Communists did their best to vandalise it with tower blocks), it is a bewitching town in the May sunshine, full of parks with mature trees, with two fast-flowing, azure rivers and a café life to rival anywhere else in the Mediterranean (and reinforcing the Montenegrins' reputation for idleness).

Rising behind the town are the mountains for which the country is named, and which account for the fact that this was the only corner of the Balkans that the Turks never conquered ("They were lazy, too," explained a Belgrade friend). Go up into the mountains and you find ski slopes, the deepest canyon in the world after the Grand Canyon, rivers that are fantastic for rafting; head for the coast and there is a fjord, bizarrely misplaced from Scandinavia, and picturesque islands and inlets reminiscent of Japan's Inland Sea. There is the huge Skadar lake, shared with Albania, that is home to hundreds of exotic varieties of birds.

All this and no Serbia: by severing the link with Big Brother, Montenegro at a stroke removes the taint of war crimes and expansionism (even though both Slobodan Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic came from Montenegro). But Serbia has hospitals and colleges and universities far more advanced than those in Montenegro. Ambitious and clever Montenegrins head to Belgrade to study. Sick Montenegrins head to Belgrade to get better. Till now they have not paid a bean for the privilege. Negotiations on the future status of clever or sick Montenegrins in Serbia have not yet started, but everyone expects the Montenegrins will henceforth have to pay. Hence at least a proportion of the 45 per cent of votes against independence.

Which brings us to the key question: where is the money coming from? Montenegro has only one productive factory, a belching Soviet-style aluminium manufacturing complex outside Podgorica - recently bought by the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. The nation's tourism potential is obvious - but long stretches of the coast have been bought up by Russians. There is no guarantee that this bewitching corner of the Adriatic will not be destroyed by hideous hotels within a few years.

During the war, when the Yugoslav economy ground to a halt, Montenegro fell back on what has long been an important standby, smuggling. In particular the large-scale smuggling of cigarettes, very cheap here and expensive everywhere else in Western Europe, became rampant - and according to the testimony of an Italian mafia supergrass, Gerardo Cuomo, the trade involved Milo Djukanovic himself, the formerly Communist politician who has run Montenegro for 16 years.

Mr Djukanovic denied the allegations flatly, and cannot be questioned in court because of parliamentary immunity. But the claimed involvement of the most powerful man in the country in organised crime is only the most glaring irregularity. Of Montenegro's population of 650,000, only 120,000 are formally employed, the rest working in the black market or in smuggling. Hence the spectre of the new mini-states, even the pretty ones like Montenegro, becoming what one diplomat called "sovereign kleptocracies", states run by and for the benefit of wealthy criminals.

Kosovo presents a far starker example. Criminal gangs "operate with impunity," according to Marek Antoni Nowicki, who was the UN's international ombudsman in Kosovo until 2005. "You have a criminal state in real power. It needs underground illegal structures to survive. These networks can rely on the weakness of the public institutions to sanction their operations."

And while in Montenegro the smuggling is counterbalanced by the new hotels and resorts, Kosovo has nothing else to fall back on. International aid is complemented by the profits from cigarette, cement and petrol smuggling.

Prostitution is the other core business, catering to the peacekeepers. What happens when they leave is anybody's guess.

Once upon a time there was a plausibly modern, enlightened Communist country called Yugoslavia which manufactured cars called Yugos and staged the Winter Olympics and which for many, including millions of Western holidaymakers, was the acceptable face of Eastern Europe, the bit that worked and that we could do business with - all dominated by the benign Mr Tito.

And today? With the decision for independence last week of tiny Montenegro, Yugoslavia is no more. Instead there is a multiplying proliferation of statelets that belong more to the world of Tintin than to what was once thought of as modern Europe.

Tintin would have felt perfectly at home in Podgorica, the Montenegrin capital. The Belgian boy detective, you will remember, arrived in the Balkan kingdom of Syldavia by aeroplane, dropped through a trap door in the fuselage by the dastardly twin brother of Professor Alembick, and landing in a bale of hay. Once there he encountered a world of revolutionaries, spies, moustachioed bandits and anarchists, all in the shade of the gigantic mountains.

Today the grandson of the last king of Montenegro travels regularly to the nation's tiny former capital, Cetinje, by motorcycle, from Paris. He denies he aims to revive the monarchy, but who could be sure? The leader of the country is a musclebound character in a chalk-stripe suit who has been a Communist and an apostle of Serbian expansionism and is now a Montenegrin nationalist. Today he mutters angrily about Serbian "meddling".

In reality (according to the testimony of an Italian gangster) he is a big-time cigarette smuggler. But he is not the only bad hat in town: the Russians are coming! They have bought the country's only factory and huge strips of the beautiful coastline.

It is a country out of comic opera or a period cartoon, with a population one-tenth the size of London. But in a year or two, if Montenegro's tall, sleek, handsome and wily Prime Minister, Milo Djukanovic, gets his way, his sovereign nation will sit alongside the UK, Germany, France and the rest in the councils of the European Union. And jostling behind him in the queue to join will be several other even more improbable specimens.

Yugoslavia ended, but what came into being? We have no handy term for what has replaced the Union of the South Slavs. We are back to the geographical term, the Balkans - from which derives the verb "to balkanise", which means "to break up into small, mutually hostile political units". We are back at the view of the Balkans immortalised by Hergé: a collection of tiny, exotic countries, racked by violence and intrigue, each with their own proud and ancient traditions but ultimately indistinguishable from one another.

And while the end of the Union of Serbia and Montenegro was inevitable, the Balkans have not achieved steady state. That churning, balkanising momentum is still at work. The break-up proceeds. Next up, heartened by the Montenegrins' example, is Kosovo, where the overwhelming Albanian majority favours independence. The Kosovars are expected to get their wish by the end of this year.

And this will set a precedent, because unlike all the bits of Yugoslavia that have broken off so far, Kosovo is not an autonomous republic within the Yugoslav federation but was merely a province within Serbia. When Kosovo breaks away, other disgruntled minorities in other corners of the Balkans will see their moment and hope that time is on their side.

The most universally execrated is Republika Srpska (aka Bosnian Serb Republic), the Serb mini-state that was fashioned by Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic during the Bosnian war as part of the Milosevic fantasy of a Greater Serbia. That mini-state, partially brought into existence by the massacre in Srebrenica, a town that today is firmly within Republika Srpska territory, may have no serious hope of international recognition, but it remains a thorn in the flesh of the High Representative in Sarajevo. And it remains a semi-spectral presence within the immensely complicated polity of Bosnia. It provides, for example, one of the republic's three presidents.

And there are others waiting in the wings. As Kosovo prepares to go independent, the Serbs who constitute the overwhelming majority of the population of the region of northern Kosovo called Mitrovica dream of getting their own state, too. Serbs clustered in the north of Montenegro who resent the decision to break away from Belgrade have separatist dreams of their own, as do Albanians in the south of that republic, and as do Albanians in Macedonia, where a civil war boiled up in 2001.
No one imagines the balkanisation of the Balkans will go that far. But then 15 years ago no one predicted the independence of Yugoslav republics such as Slovenia and Croatia, which are now on their way to joining the European Union. And what's wrong, after all, with states the size of Elephant and Castle or Maida Vale? Perhaps we should all live in countries that size.

From the cane chairs of the long pavement café of the Crna Gora Hotel in the centre of Podgorica, it's hard to disagree. On first blush Montenegro seems an excellent idea, and a very satisfactory little country.

Podgorica, the Montenegrin capital, formerly one of Yugoslavia's several Titograds, was bombed flat by the British during the war, though a small Ottoman old town survived. But although the architecture is not up to much (the Communists did their best to vandalise it with tower blocks), it is a bewitching town in the May sunshine, full of parks with mature trees, with two fast-flowing, azure rivers and a café life to rival anywhere else in the Mediterranean (and reinforcing the Montenegrins' reputation for idleness).

Rising behind the town are the mountains for which the country is named, and which account for the fact that this was the only corner of the Balkans that the Turks never conquered ("They were lazy, too," explained a Belgrade friend). Go up into the mountains and you find ski slopes, the deepest canyon in the world after the Grand Canyon, rivers that are fantastic for rafting; head for the coast and there is a fjord, bizarrely misplaced from Scandinavia, and picturesque islands and inlets reminiscent of Japan's Inland Sea. There is the huge Skadar lake, shared with Albania, that is home to hundreds of exotic varieties of birds.

All this and no Serbia: by severing the link with Big Brother, Montenegro at a stroke removes the taint of war crimes and expansionism (even though both Slobodan Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic came from Montenegro). But Serbia has hospitals and colleges and universities far more advanced than those in Montenegro. Ambitious and clever Montenegrins head to Belgrade to study. Sick Montenegrins head to Belgrade to get better. Till now they have not paid a bean for the privilege. Negotiations on the future status of clever or sick Montenegrins in Serbia have not yet started, but everyone expects the Montenegrins will henceforth have to pay. Hence at least a proportion of the 45 per cent of votes against independence.

Which brings us to the key question: where is the money coming from? Montenegro has only one productive factory, a belching Soviet-style aluminium manufacturing complex outside Podgorica - recently bought by the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. The nation's tourism potential is obvious - but long stretches of the coast have been bought up by Russians. There is no guarantee that this bewitching corner of the Adriatic will not be destroyed by hideous hotels within a few years.

During the war, when the Yugoslav economy ground to a halt, Montenegro fell back on what has long been an important standby, smuggling. In particular the large-scale smuggling of cigarettes, very cheap here and expensive everywhere else in Western Europe, became rampant - and according to the testimony of an Italian mafia supergrass, Gerardo Cuomo, the trade involved Milo Djukanovic himself, the formerly Communist politician who has run Montenegro for 16 years.

Mr Djukanovic denied the allegations flatly, and cannot be questioned in court because of parliamentary immunity. But the claimed involvement of the most powerful man in the country in organised crime is only the most glaring irregularity. Of Montenegro's population of 650,000, only 120,000 are formally employed, the rest working in the black market or in smuggling. Hence the spectre of the new mini-states, even the pretty ones like Montenegro, becoming what one diplomat called "sovereign kleptocracies", states run by and for the benefit of wealthy criminals.

Kosovo presents a far starker example. Criminal gangs "operate with impunity," according to Marek Antoni Nowicki, who was the UN's international ombudsman in Kosovo until 2005. "You have a criminal state in real power. It needs underground illegal structures to survive. These networks can rely on the weakness of the public institutions to sanction their operations."

And while in Montenegro the smuggling is counterbalanced by the new hotels and resorts, Kosovo has nothing else to fall back on. International aid is complemented by the profits from cigarette, cement and petrol smuggling.

Prostitution is the other core business, catering to the peacekeepers. What happens when they leave is anybody's guess.

(taken from: http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article620190.ece)

Monday, May 15, 2006

Croatia champs aid Hague suspects

| 11:32 May 15 | BBC


ZAGREB -- Croatia's football champions are to donate proceeds to help Croatian war crimes suspects at The Hague.

Dinamo Zagreb's Maksimir stadium was filled to its 45,000 capacity, after the club urged as many fans as possible to attend Saturday's game.

They saw the team complete a convincing win of the league championship.

Croatia's most notable defendant in The Hague is former general Ante Gotovina, accused of atrocities against Serbs in 1995.

Prominent individuals and institutions in Croatia have expressed support for Croatian war crime suspects, but perhaps not in such a public way.

Before the game a short film was shown marking the 16th anniversary of the infamous football riot which took place between Serbian and Croatian fans in May 1990 and which many still see as a symbol of the break-up of the former Yugoslavia.

Defendants in The Hague receive support in varying amounts from their home governments as well as donations from individuals.

Prosecutors at The Hague have refused to comment on Dinamo's plans, saying it is a private matter.

B92 celebrates 17th birthday

| 09:21 May 15 | B92


BELGRADE -- B92 celebrates 17 years since its founding today.

To mark the anniversary, TV B92 will be presenting new programming to its viewers.

According to Editor-in-Chief Veran Matić, there will be new features in both informative and entertainment programs.

“We are bringing in a new morning television show ‘Dizanje’ to make the waking and start of the work day more positive for our viewers and to help them alleviate all the hardships of the day with information given in a pleasant ambient. There will be a half-hour news show at 4 pm, in order to increase the informative programming, and at 8 pm, for the next several months, we will be showing 25 episodes of the very popular television show ‘4400.’” Matić said.

Koštunica in Germany

| 14:55 May 15 | Beta


BELGRADE, BERLIN -- Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica begins a two-day visit to Germany today.

Koštunica will meet today with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Foreign Affairs Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier to talk about the current situation in Serbia and the region.

The Serbian Prime Minister will be speaking at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation headquarters, which is associated with the conservative Christian-Democratic Union, the organisation which invited Koštunica to Berlin. He will be speaking on the topic of “Serbia on the road to the EU.”

Koštunica will travel to Düsseldorf tomorrow where he will meet with regional government officials and representatives of German companies that are currently doing business in Serbia.

He will also be speaking with Deutsche Bank officials regarding investment possibilities in Serbia.

Accompanying Kostunica on the trip will be Serbian Foreign Economic Relations Minister Milan Parivodić, Economic Minister Predrag Bubalo and Capital Investments Minister Velimir Ilić.

Participating voters oppose Ugljanin

| 12:18 May 15 | B92

NOVI PAZAR -- An overwhelming percentage of participating voters in Novi Pazar stands firmly against Municipal President Sulejman Ugljanin.

According to the results of this unofficial referendum, 30.6 per cent of registered voters participated and 98.3 per cent of them voted against Ugljanin. According to the statistics, 20,833 voters voted “yes” in opposition of Ugljanin and 283 voted “no.”

There are 69,243 registered voters in Novi Pazar. The referendum was organised by the political parties that made up the majority in the Novi Pazar Parliament before the Serbian Government disbanded it and named Ugljanin president.

The Novi Pazar Government was disbanded last month and the new, temporary administration formed a new municipal elections commission which decided that the opposition referendum would be pushed back from May 14 to June 25.

The parties that made up the parliamentary majority earlier do not recognise the commission or the postponement of the referendum and held the referendum for opposing Ugljanin this weekend.

The voting was peaceful and no incidents were reported. Many citizens were confused by the situation, especially by the voting headquarters, some of which were set up on street corners and in private homes.

The results show that Ugljanin’s supporters are waiting to participate in the June 25 referendum.

Montenegro airlines cancels flights

| 15:23 May 15 | FoNet


BELGRADE -- Montenegro airlines has cancelled a total of 34 flights scheduled in between May 19-22.

Nikola Tesla Airport in Belgrade has announced that Montenegro airlines will not be flying to Belgrade, Zurich, or Podgorica on the aforementioned dates.

There was no reason given for the cancellations but it has been stated earlier that Montenegrin citizens living outside the country will be enabled to return in order to participate in the May 21 independence referendum.

Pre-referendum tensions heighten in Montenegro

| 09:36 May 15 | FoNet


MOJKOVAC -- Massive fights, gun fire and threats have all been reported in North Montenegro, as the referendum date approaches.

Montenegro independence activist Milan Filipović’s car was set on fire in front of his family home. The automobile had a Montenegrin coat-of-arms on its license plate.

Filipović said that his car was set on fire for “clearly political reasons.”

The Bjelo Polje and Mojkovac police forces are investigating the incident, but did not wish to release and information to the press.

The Montenegrin independence referendum will be held on May 21.